|
Rivers & Trails Hands-on Technical
Assistance
 The
Rivers & Trails Program of the National Park Service
provides hands-on technical assistance to nonprofits,
informal groups and alliances. Applicants are strongly
encouraged to discuss their project with RTCA staff before
sending in an application.
The program focuses on projects that lead to
on-the-ground results, such as improved trails, conserved
shorelines and protected acres. John Monroe (Director of
Connecticut and Rhode Island projects) is accepting
inquiries from prospective project partners during the
spring and summer.
Letters of request must be submitted by August 1st. Learn
more at
http://www.nps.gov/ncrc/programs/rtca/contactus/cu_apply.html
. Please email john_monroe "at" nps.gov or call 617
223 5049.
Stream Barrier Removal Monitoring Guide
The
River Restoration Monitoring Committee of the Gulf of Maine
Council is pleased to announce the publication of the Stream
Barrier Removal Monitoring Guide at
http://gulfofmaine.org/streambarrierremoval
The Stream Barrier Removal Monitoring Guide provides a
framework of critical monitoring parameters for use at dam
and culvert removal sites in the Gulf of Maine watershed.
When analyzed collectively, the eight parameters will allow
restoration practitioners to document the physical,
chemical, and biological effects of stream barrier removal.
The critical monitoring parameters include monumented
cross sections, longitudinal profile, grain size
distribution, photo stations, water quality, riparian plant
community structure, macroinvertebrates, and fish passage.
The Guide presents the scientific context for barrier
removal and gives detailed methods and data sheets for six
parameters.
The Guide is based on the input of more than 70
scientists, natural resource managers, engineers,
consultants, and staff from non-governmental organizations
in Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, New Brunswick, and
Nova Scotia. Final review was sought from experts in barrier
removal monitoring from outside the Gulf of Maine region.
For more information about the Stream Barrier Removal
Monitoring Guide, please contact:
Matt Collins, NOAA Restoration Center, (978) 281-9142
Kevin Lucey, New Hampshire Coastal Program (603) 599-0026
Beth Lambert, Massachusetts Riverways Program (617) 626-1526
Jon Kachmar, Maine Coastal Program (207) 287-1913
ROGER
REYNOLDS
ENVIRONMENTAL ATTORNEY OF THE YEAR
I n December, at its annual meeting, Rivers
Alliance was delighted to honor Roger Reynolds, senior staff attorney
at Connecticut Fund for the Environment, as Environmental Attorney of
the Year. Mr. Reynolds has worked with Rivers Alliance and numerous
other groups to defend the state’s most basic environmental laws (the
Connecticut Environmental Protection Act and the Connecticut
Environmental Policy Act); to protect prudent water-diversion policy
in general and individual diversion permits; to establish a fair
method of disposing of state “surplus� lands without giving away
valuable resources; to improve sewage treatment; to bolster wetlands
protections and so forth. Meanwhile, he has also done important work
on air-quality cases and the Broadwater project in L.I. Sound. He can
master hundreds of details rapidly, and he is an expert negotiator.
Thanks, Roger.
Richard H. Goodwin, Prominent Environmental
Scientist and Wetlands Protector Dies at 96.
Richard H. Goodwin died July 7, 2007. He was 96. Goodwin
was a pioneer on behalf of the environment, especially in
land preservation and wetlands protection. He is survived
by his wife of 71 years, Esther Bemis Goodwin, two children,
four grandchildren and two great grandchildren.
Goodwin was a professor emeritus of botany at
Connecticut
College , a past president of
The Nature Conservancy (TNC) (1956-58
and 1964-66), and a co-founder, with William A. Niering, of
the
Connecticut Chapter of TNC. Goodwin co-authored a
number of articles with Niering, including "Inland wetlands of the United States: Evaluated as potential registered natural landmarks (Natural history theme studies) " 2 v. U.S. Dept. Interior in 1971, "Inland Wetland Plants of Connecticut
" Conn. Arboretum
Bull. 19 in 1973 and "Wealth of the wetlands "
Pequot Trails 2 (2): 9-15 in 1974. The
Connecticut
College Goodwin-Niering Center for Conservation Biology and
Environmental Studies was founded in 1993 and renamed in
1999 in honor of the two men's great collaboration in the
environmental field.
Other publications included
Connecticut's Coastal Marshes a Vanishing Resource (CT Arboretum Bulletin No. 12, Feb., 1961) ,
The Connecticut College Arboretum: Its sixth decade and a detailed history of the land (Bulletin / Connecticut College Arboretum) ,
The flora of Mendon Ponds Park (Proceedings of the Rochester Academy of Science) ,
Check list of woody plants growing in the Connecticut Arboretum and guide to the Arboretum (Connecticut College, New London. Connecticut Arboretum. Bulletin) and
The flora of the Burnham Brook Preserve of the Nature Conservancy (Studies in human ecology) ,
During his tenure with TNC, Goodwin negotiated in 1960, the
then-largest deal in the TNC's history, protecting 6,500
forested acres on the California coast.
Goodwin served as a director of Connecticut College's
arboretum, and stayed active there even after he stepped
down of as a director. During his sixty years of
involvement there, the acreage increase from 90 acres to 750
acres today.
Goodwin also established the Conservation and Research
Foundation, an independent venture launched in 1953 to offer
seed grants to scientists and others seeking to study and
preserve the natural environment.
Goodwin held both a bachelor's degree and a master's degree
in botany and doctorate degree in biology with a
concentration in botany from
Harvard University . He published his autobiography
in 2002:
A botanist's window on the twentieth century
( Harvard Forest , Petersham , Mass. ).
Goodwin was a member of Rivers Alliance of
Connecticut for many years and a close friend of
Rivers Alliance director David Bingham, who offers this
remembrance:
Dick will be remembered as a giant among those who have
worked for land conservation and protecting earth's natural
resources.
He was a man of science who left a promising career and
research to lead a movement based on stewardship of the
land. He was a great teacher, a mentor for over two
generations of students, both within and outside the
classroom. He was a man of vision, with a knack for bringing
people together to accomplish their mutual goals. He was
remarkably generous, both with his money and with his time,
leading by example in achieving one successful project after
another. And he was a man of gentle patience, waiting at
times for decades for the moment when the seeds he had
planted bore fruit.
We feel a great void, and no one will fill his shoes. But
there are hundreds if not thousands of others that Dick
Goodwin has inspired to carry on his important mission,
working with dedication and confidence in the cause of
stewardship he taught us how to pursue.
A short video featuring Richard Goodwin is
available from the CT Nature Conservancy at:
http://www.conncoll.edu/news/goodwin/
INTERVENTIONS
Rivers Alliance intervened on two issues at the Connecticut
Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) in recent months.
General Permits: With
Connecticut Fund for the Environment,
Farmington River Watershed Association,
and Trout Unlimited, we worked as intervenors with DEP staff on proposed new General
Permits for water diversions. These permits allow minor water diversions to go
forward without individual scrutiny and oversight.
Our first goal was to be
sure that only minor activities are eligible for such permits. A second
effort was aimed at countering the tendency in the originally proposed permits
to allow activities to go forward without filing for the diversion in question
(basically an honor system) or with a filing-only approach, which would not
require any kind of sign-off from the DEP. Finally, we sought to support and
enhance DEP's proposed permit conditions that enhanced protections for
sensitive areas, such as headwaters. We were much helped by the volunteer
assistance of Gail Batchelder from Loureiro Engineering Associates. David
Radka of Connecticut Water Company ably provided expertise from the utilities'
perspective. DEP's Denise Ruzicka and Doug Hoskins led the way to the final,
satisfactory resolution.
If you have questions as to what
activities are covered under what permit, feel free to ask us (860-361-9349; rivers@riversalliance.org) or Doug
Hoskins,
Bureau of Water Protection and Land Reuse / Inland Water Resources
Division, Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, 79 Elm Street, Hartford,
CT 06106. Phone: 860-424-4192; Douglas.Hopkins@po.state.ct.us
Torrington Litchfield Water Diversion: A very
similar team (Rivers Alliance, Connecticut Fund for the Environment,
Trout Unlimited, and
Housatonic Valley Association) intervened in an application from
Torrington Water Company (TWC) and
Aquarion water company for the transfer of
400,000 gallons per day from TWC to Aquarion's Litchfield system. This would
be 200,000 gallons more per day than allowed under an existing permit that was
expiring.
The issue here was brought to our attention by soil
scientist Sean Hayden of the
Northwest Conservation District. The streams in
the TWC donor basin of the West Naugatuck River need more water. Should not
TWC release additional water from its reservoirs into its own streams before
selling water out of basin? The DEP was inclined to say, yes, and had included
in its proposed permit conditions that would require TWC to study the needs of
its streams and means to meet those needs. Moreover, the DEP proposed permit gave
the DEP commissioner the authority to order, eventually, appropriate flow
releases.
TWC protested strongly, pointing out that that they
possessed grandfathered claims to all the water in question and much more. They had registered their reservoirs in 1982 under the Water Diversion Policy
Act. (Those readers who followed the Shepaug River case will recognize this as
similar to the argument by the City of Waterbury that it should not be required
to release more water into the Shepaug.) In addition, the water companies
pointed that a stream flow regulation is in progress, and any flow-management
plan should be based on that regulation.
DEP countered that the grandfathered exemptions from
permitting requirements do not extend to sales outside a utility's service
area. The environmental team, of course, agreed with the DEP, and also argued
that negotiations regarding stream flow should not depend upon the
unpredictable process of regulation writing. However, the legal issues were
not crystal clear. Moreover, all parties recognized that Aquarion faces real
challenges in meeting Litchfield's water demand, and TWC had indicated it was
ready to drop the application if the permit were to include mandated releases.
We were pleased with the compromise that resulted after
months of back and forth. The DEP will issue a new permit for a transfer from Torrington to Litchfield at the current level of 200,000 gallons per day. But the permit
will run only for seven years (rather than 25 years). TWC will provide
five-years worth of data on stream flows and reservoir levels, which will be
useful in determining the needs of that basin. TWC will also prepare a
preliminary feasibility study on engineering options for making increased
releases from its reservoirs. This moves us closer to a science-based
solution to the needs of the streams in West Naugatuck basin.
|