(Page last updated Mar 25, 2008)
News and Articles
|
|
|
Rivers & Trails Hands-on Technical Assistance
The program focuses on projects that lead to on-the-ground results, such as improved trails, conserved shorelines and protected acres. John Monroe (Director of Connecticut and Rhode Island projects) is accepting inquiries from prospective project partners during the spring and summer. Letters of request must be submitted by August 1st. Learn more at http://www.nps.gov/ncrc/programs/rtca/contactus/cu_apply.html . Please email john_monroe "at" nps.gov or call 617 223 5049. Stream Barrier Removal Monitoring Guide
The Stream Barrier Removal Monitoring Guide provides a framework of critical monitoring parameters for use at dam and culvert removal sites in the Gulf of Maine watershed. When analyzed collectively, the eight parameters will allow restoration practitioners to document the physical, chemical, and biological effects of stream barrier removal. The critical monitoring parameters include monumented cross sections, longitudinal profile, grain size distribution, photo stations, water quality, riparian plant community structure, macroinvertebrates, and fish passage. The Guide presents the scientific context for barrier removal and gives detailed methods and data sheets for six parameters. The Guide is based on the input of more than 70 scientists, natural resource managers, engineers, consultants, and staff from non-governmental organizations in Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia. Final review was sought from experts in barrier removal monitoring from outside the Gulf of Maine region. For more information about the Stream Barrier Removal Monitoring Guide, please contact: Matt Collins, NOAA Restoration Center, (978) 281-9142 Kevin Lucey, New Hampshire Coastal Program (603) 599-0026 Beth Lambert, Massachusetts Riverways Program (617) 626-1526 Jon Kachmar, Maine Coastal Program (207) 287-1913
ROGER
REYNOLDS n December, at its annual meeting, Rivers Alliance was delighted to honor Roger Reynolds, senior staff attorney at Connecticut Fund for the Environment, as Environmental Attorney of the Year. Mr. Reynolds has worked with Rivers Alliance and numerous other groups to defend the state’s most basic environmental laws (the Connecticut Environmental Protection Act and the Connecticut Environmental Policy Act); to protect prudent water-diversion policy in general and individual diversion permits; to establish a fair method of disposing of state “surplus” lands without giving away valuable resources; to improve sewage treatment; to bolster wetlands protections and so forth. Meanwhile, he has also done important work on air-quality cases and the Broadwater project in L.I. Sound. He can master hundreds of details rapidly, and he is an expert negotiator. Thanks, Roger. Richard H. Goodwin, Prominent Environmental Scientist and Wetlands Protector Dies at 96.
Goodwin was a professor emeritus of botany at
Connecticut
College , a past president of
The Nature Conservancy (TNC) (1956-58
and 1964-66), and a co-founder, with William A. Niering, of
the
Connecticut Chapter of TNC. Goodwin co-authored a
number of articles with Niering, including "Inland wetlands of the United States: Evaluated as potential registered natural landmarks (Natural history theme studies)
Other publications included
Connecticut's Coastal Marshes a Vanishing Resource (CT Arboretum Bulletin No. 12, Feb., 1961)
Goodwin served as a director of Connecticut College's arboretum, and stayed active there even after he stepped down of as a director. During his sixty years of involvement there, the acreage increase from 90 acres to 750 acres today.
Goodwin also established the Conservation and Research Foundation, an independent venture launched in 1953 to offer seed grants to scientists and others seeking to study and preserve the natural environment.
Goodwin held both a bachelor's degree and a master's degree
in botany and doctorate degree in biology with a
concentration in botany from
Harvard University . He published his autobiography
in 2002:
A botanist's window on the twentieth century
Goodwin was a member of Rivers Alliance of Connecticut for many years and a close friend of Rivers Alliance director David Bingham, who offers this remembrance:
He was a man of science who left a promising career and research to lead a movement based on stewardship of the land. He was a great teacher, a mentor for over two generations of students, both within and outside the classroom. He was a man of vision, with a knack for bringing people together to accomplish their mutual goals. He was remarkably generous, both with his money and with his time, leading by example in achieving one successful project after another. And he was a man of gentle patience, waiting at times for decades for the moment when the seeds he had planted bore fruit.
We feel a great void, and no one will fill his shoes. But there are hundreds if not thousands of others that Dick Goodwin has inspired to carry on his important mission, working with dedication and confidence in the cause of stewardship he taught us how to pursue.
A short video featuring Richard Goodwin is available from the CT Nature Conservancy at: http://www.conncoll.edu/news/goodwin/
Rivers Alliance intervened on two issues at the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) in recent months. General Permits: With Connecticut Fund for the Environment, Farmington River Watershed Association, and Trout Unlimited, we worked as intervenors with DEP staff on proposed new General Permits for water diversions. These permits allow minor water diversions to go forward without individual scrutiny and oversight. Our first goal was to be sure that only minor activities are eligible for such permits. A second effort was aimed at countering the tendency in the originally proposed permits to allow activities to go forward without filing for the diversion in question (basically an honor system) or with a filing-only approach, which would not require any kind of sign-off from the DEP. Finally, we sought to support and enhance DEP's proposed permit conditions that enhanced protections for sensitive areas, such as headwaters. We were much helped by the volunteer assistance of Gail Batchelder from Loureiro Engineering Associates. David Radka of Connecticut Water Company ably provided expertise from the utilities' perspective. DEP's Denise Ruzicka and Doug Hoskins led the way to the final, satisfactory resolution. If you have questions as to what activities are covered under what permit, feel free to ask us (860-361-9349; rivers@riversalliance.org) or Doug Hoskins, Bureau of Water Protection and Land Reuse / Inland Water Resources Division, Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, 79 Elm Street, Hartford, CT 06106. Phone: 860-424-4192; Douglas.Hopkins@po.state.ct.us Torrington Litchfield Water Diversion: A very similar team (Rivers Alliance, Connecticut Fund for the Environment, Trout Unlimited, and Housatonic Valley Association) intervened in an application from Torrington Water Company (TWC) and Aquarion water company for the transfer of 400,000 gallons per day from TWC to Aquarion's Litchfield system. This would be 200,000 gallons more per day than allowed under an existing permit that was expiring. The issue here was brought to our attention by soil scientist Sean Hayden of the Northwest Conservation District. The streams in the TWC donor basin of the West Naugatuck River need more water. Should not TWC release additional water from its reservoirs into its own streams before selling water out of basin? The DEP was inclined to say, yes, and had included in its proposed permit conditions that would require TWC to study the needs of its streams and means to meet those needs. Moreover, the DEP proposed permit gave the DEP commissioner the authority to order, eventually, appropriate flow releases. TWC protested strongly, pointing out that that they possessed grandfathered claims to all the water in question and much more. They had registered their reservoirs in 1982 under the Water Diversion Policy Act. (Those readers who followed the Shepaug River case will recognize this as similar to the argument by the City of Waterbury that it should not be required to release more water into the Shepaug.) In addition, the water companies pointed that a stream flow regulation is in progress, and any flow-management plan should be based on that regulation. DEP countered that the grandfathered exemptions from permitting requirements do not extend to sales outside a utility's service area. The environmental team, of course, agreed with the DEP, and also argued that negotiations regarding stream flow should not depend upon the unpredictable process of regulation writing. However, the legal issues were not crystal clear. Moreover, all parties recognized that Aquarion faces real challenges in meeting Litchfield's water demand, and TWC had indicated it was ready to drop the application if the permit were to include mandated releases. We were pleased with the compromise that resulted after months of back and forth. The DEP will issue a new permit for a transfer from Torrington to Litchfield at the current level of 200,000 gallons per day. But the permit will run only for seven years (rather than 25 years). TWC will provide five-years worth of data on stream flows and reservoir levels, which will be useful in determining the needs of that basin. TWC will also prepare a preliminary feasibility study on engineering options for making increased releases from its reservoirs. This moves us closer to a science-based solution to the needs of the streams in West Naugatuck basin.
|
|
|
STREAM FLOW REGULATION PROGRESS
The process includes a commissioner's advisory committee, required by the statute, and two work groups, one on science and one on policy. All groups are diverse, but the science group naturally includes more people with expertise in fisheries, hydrology, and so on. The commissioner's advisory committee and the policy group tend to discuss the same issues. These two groups both include representatives of water companies, river groups, agricultural interests, the Department of Public Health, and so on. DEP staff is in charge. DEP Commissioner Gina McCarthy attends some of the advisory group meetings, and follows the debates closely, pressing for answers. Rivers Alliance of Connecticut is represented on the official advisory group by Director Lynn Werner, who is Executive Director of the Housatonic Valley Association. Director Marc Taylor, M.D, and RA Executive Director Margaret Miner serve on the policy group, and usually monitor the advisory committee. The approach emerging is the creation of an index system of classifying water courses into three classes according to current conditions and future expectations. The highest-class waters will have the highest protection for flows; rivers falling into a lower class would be subject to relatively greater diversions. There are many dozens of complications, but some of the toughest issues are: Should there be a fourth class (for what are sometimes called "sacrificial" rivers)? Is there any protective standard that is actually feasible? (So far, it seems that groundwater withdrawals are most problematic in this respect, but the problem appears solvable with a more appropriate measure of the impact of groundwater withdrawals.) Is there any index system that can in most cases, or many cases, take the place of site-specific studies in devising flow-management plans? (Maybe not.) What would be the best approach for implementing a new standard? (A phase-in program?) Please be in touch if you have questions or suggestions or would like to be involved.
|
|
|
Subsidiary of United Technologies to Pay $12 Million For Polluting Farmington River
|
|
Rivers Alliance Directors In the News!
|
|
DEP Protects Sound from Boat Sewage
|
|